Google+
Showing posts with label eu_acp. Show all posts
Showing posts with label eu_acp. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 14, 2009

CTA’s 14th Brussels Briefing: woman bites dog or why media matter for rural development

At the Brussels Briefing # 14, organised by CTA on 12 October, a lively discussion on media and rural development took place. The debate was fed by contributions of a variety of panelists and a large crowd of participants from ACP countries. Why is there so little reporting done on regular media on issues concerning farmers and rural communities? Why do the media treat the food crisis as an urban issue? Can journalists partner with farmers, politicians, policy advocates and researchers in promoting rural development? What is the role of the new media and do ICTs contribute?

To prepare for this session the organiser CTA hosted a 4 weeks e-discussion. Susana Thorp from WREN gave a brief summary of the outcomes. First and foremost, Mrs. Thorp emphasized that participants hope that discussion actually leads to action. The e-debate focused on constraints faced by media on – conflicting - expectations of various stakeholders on new media and ICTs, and on support for enhancing media activities and building capacities. A summary of the e-debate is available here.

It was interesting to observe that at this Brussels Briefing the majority of panelist and quite a number of participants were female. Mrs. Tumi Makgabo, lead discussant and former CNN anchor stressed that in the world of media women have more barriers to overcome than men. But together with Mrs. Violet Otindo of K24TV in Kenya, winner of the CNN African Journalist Award, and all the other women participating in this debate she showed it can be done.

How do women overcome these barriers? Violet Otindo mentioned the importance of mentoring, but she said it should be used with care. For a journalist mentoring involves risks because it exposes you to political and commercial interests. Lack of resources and equipment are the major barrier according to her. She remarked that when you have no resources, everything takes more time. As a journalist you have to work smart and time management skills are essential. She feels that more recognition for the work of local African journalists is important, the big media houses should make more use of local journalists. Also support initiatives involving training and awards can be helpful.

Tumi Makgabo defined herself as a feminist with three-inch heels. You have to counter the way media portray women as a victim by acting like the opposite. She wants women to have a voice and she feels she can contribute more working as an independent journalist from Africa. She also illustrated how women seek to balance professional and private goals by telling how for her living in Africa as opposed to Atlanta serves both. As for the professional goals: Mrs. Makgabo stressed that with the new technologies Africans can tell stories about Africa: “we can tell our stories from any place now”.

In his keynote address CTA’s director Hansjörg Neun observed that media tend to report on the extraordinary – a man biting a dog is news, the reverse is not. Much of the messages on rural development do not seem to qualify as news. The first panel was lead by Tumi Makgabo of South Africa, a former anchor of CNN Inside Africa, now African Broadcasting and Media, and director of the African Women Development Fund. She introduced the panelists: Mr. Jean-Philippe Rapp who founded in 1985 the International North-South Media Forum, Mrs. Brave Nsidale, Ambassador of Malawi, Mr. Ignatius Jean, Representative of IICA and former minister of Agriculture of St. Lucia, Mr. Thozi Gwanya, Director General of the Department of Land Reform in South Africa and Mrs. Krishendaye Rampershad, media consultant based in Trinidad.

Ms. Rampershad emphasized that it is important to differentiate: are we talking high tech corporate media or low tech community based. She felt the latter to be very powerful in serving development objectives. To those wishing to communicate messages to rural populations Ms. Rampershad had a clear advice: talk normal! Extension people have to be communicators and not talk science. Mr. Gwanya felt that media systematically ignored rural people and their interests. Mr. Jean of IICA observed that technical people in agriculture and media may not understand or like each other but they do need each other. In the Carribean Mr. Jean has observed that ICTs and the participatory information sharing they enable, have dismantled monopolies. He also emphasized that new partnerships emerge; in the oral, musical community of the Carribean the power of songs and the influence of musicians can support our communication for agriculture. Jean-Philippe Rapp commented on Hansjörg Neun’s example but he argued that the current food insecurity and plague of hunger is indeed a case of “man bites dog” and considered quite newsworthy. He observed a sincere interest among media for agriculture, but there is also a shift, he noted: media look for testimonies, there is less interest for the stories of the experts.

After the contributions of the panelists Ms. Makgabo opened the debate and the floor. She challenged the panelists: if people continue to buy tabloids that pay no attention to issues and needs of rural people, who are we to question these priorities? Ms. Rampershad emphasized that you may see this disconnection in public and corporate media, but in community driven media agendas are set differently. Mr. Rapp emphasized that agriculture is not a difficult or grateful subject but you need to tell the story with passion and in original, authentic language.

In the ensuing debate the focus was on the relations between the various stakeholders. There is often antagonism between politicians and media but participants also commented on how scientists are suspicious of journalists and vice versa. You can remove that suspicion by talking about the differences and the different roles, looking for common ground. Specific, deliberate and focused education initiatives may help to bridge the gap between what media (thinks it) needs and what the industry needs and what both sides can do.

Ms. Protz, the coordinator of CARIMAC, noted that few agriculture ministries actually do have a communication strategy. She observed that the media coverage of the climate change issue was not lead by journalists but by communities, the corporate and public media enlisted later in the process. Maureen Agena of the Women of Uganda Network questioned the role of (urban) journalists: how do you report on something you are not involved in? WOUGNET works with citizen journalists, women reporting on their own problems. Other participants questioned whether these citizen journalists had the skills and ethics to communicate responsibly.

More information on this briefing and earlier editions are available on the website of the Brussels Development Briefings and - in French - Briefings sur le Développement à Bruxelles

To get regular updates subscribe to the Euforic English language newsfeed for the Brussels Briefings or to the French language newsfeed at Briefings à Bruxelles

More on EU cooperation with ACP countries is available in the corresponding Euforic newsfeed on EU-ACP cooperation. Euforic also has a newsfeed on information, knowledge and communication. Visit the CTA website for more on agriculture and rural development in ACP countries.

Thursday, October 08, 2009

ECDPM seeks your views on policy priorities for 2010



In a world where countries and regions must cooperate to address urgent problems – climate change, conflict, food security, health and education – ECDPM helps countries in Europe, Africa, the Caribbean and the Pacific (ACP) build effective partnerships. The Centre provides support to key development processes in developing regions and countries in a long term perspective.

ECDPM is currently preparing its annual paper on the challenges for EU-ACP development cooperation for the year ahead and is very much interested in your views on the policy priorities for your country/region for 2010 and particularly how the EU can support these. Please take five minutes to respond to this anonymous survey by 23 October 2009 (you can also reply in French).

Click here to access the survey.

Also check out Euforic's newsfeeds on ECDPM, and on EU-ACP cooperation

Next Brussels Development Briefing on rural development and the media

The next Brussels Development Briefing will be held on 12th October 2009 (14h30 – 18h30) on the role of the media in rural development.

We will discuss the need to mainstream media in development and increase donor’s attention to media as well as the challenges the journalists and media specialists face when addressing agricultural and rural development issues in their work. We will try to find more on how media can better serve rural communities in ACP countries. This Briefing will be part of the 25th Anniversary events of CTA and we will have with us prominent policy-makers and media specialists sharing with us their experience and views on these issues.

For the programme and registration form, please check http://brusselsbriefings.net/.

Earlier Brussels Briefings looked at
'Upgrading to compete in a globalised world: What opportunities and challenges for SMEs in agriculture in ACP countries?','The Role of Livestock for ACP countries: challenges and opportunities ahead', ' Meeting Food Safety Standards: Implications for ACP agricultural exports', 'Fighting against Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fishing (IUU): Impacts and challenges for ACP countries', 'Land access and rural development: New challenges, new opportunities', 'How does international migration affect ACP rural development?', 'Rising food prices: an opportunity for change?', 'New drivers, new players in ACP rural development', 'Does Fair Trade contribute to sustainable development?', 'The climate challenge for ACP agriculture', 'Aid for Trade', 'Advancing African Agriculture' and 'Challenges to rural development in ACP countries.'

Sign up for the Brussels Briefing newsfeed; see also the Euforic newsfeed on rural development and media

Monday, August 10, 2009

European Development Cooperation from Maastricht until today: Institutional reforms are not met by political commitment

A new working paper by the Austrian Foundation for International Development (ÖFSE) analyses the European Development Cooperation from the Maastricht Treaty in 1993 until today. The author contrasts the institutional progress in the EU Development Cooperation Framework with the lack of political commitment to make good use of it.

Since the Maastricht Treaty the various instruments in EC Development Cooperation were reduced to an acceptable level which helped to improve consistency and effectiveness of European external relations. Institutional changes are far from being perfect but nevertheless they can help to achieve the growing ambitions of EU Development Cooperation since the 1990s. However, the various commitments dealing with the political aspects of EU Development Cooperation seem to contradict the process of institutional reform.

Looking at the EU Policy towards the ACP countries, Latin America, Asia and the EU Neighbourhood the author shows various examples for these failed commitments. He concludes:

"It is not to be forgotten that although institutions can sketch out a pathway to development, it is still the people working in the institutions that make policy. Currently Parliamentarians and particularly Commissioners shape the policies and in the end, the heads of the member countries have the final say. Very much depends upon their will, dedication and assertiveness."

By Martin Behrens


See the Euforic newsfeed and dossier on EC Development Cooperation and its management.

See also our dossiers and newsfeeds for the EC policy with ACP, Latin America, Asia and the EU Neighbourhood.

Thursday, July 23, 2009

Vacancy at ECDPM, Maastricht



We have pleasure in announcing the following vacancy:

Research Assistant for the Economic and Trade Cooperation Programme


The European Centre for Development Policy Management (ECDPM) is looking for a creative individual for a 6 month assignment (with possible extension/promotion based upon outstanding performance) to execute activities that will maximize the impact of the Centre's dialogue,
networking and capacity development activities in the context of ACP-EU cooperation.

Your expertise will allow you to assist in the research and execution of activities of the centre’s ACP-EU Economic & Trade Cooperation Programme as well as to assist the manager of the website www.acp-eu-trade.org

Closing date: August 14, 2009

For further details and application form, please visit: www.ecdpm.org/vacancies

Also check out Euforic's newsfeeds on ECDPM, and on ACP trade

Thursday, July 16, 2009

New CTA website now live



The new-look CTA website went live on Wednesday July 1, 2009. It will serve as a platform to access relevant, precise and timely information tailored to the end user, on the priorities for agricultural development and rural ACP communities. The new site, featuring a new content management system, will facilitate greater interaction and better information management on the backend of the site. The improvements to the site include a new federated search engine, an improved Google map feature to showcase CTA partners and a new thematic feed from the site.

Also check out Euforic's newsfeeds on CTA, and on agriculture

Wednesday, July 15, 2009

Weekly Compass: ECDPM's new information service



ECDPM has launched Weekly Compass, an information service which substantially improves on and replaces the ECDPM ACP-EU News. It provides policy intelligence, hot of the press news and access to relevant documents pertaining to a wide array of policy issues, encompassing, for example, EU-Africa relations, EPA trade negotiations or EU Neighbourhood Policy.

Built on a rapidly growing online archive of some 11,000 news resources, Weekly Compass subscribers can choose between short weekly summary of key news, an extended version, a selection of newsfeeds. You can even follow Weekly Compass on Twitter!

For more information contact the editor, Melissa Julian

Also check out Euforic's newsfeeds on ECDPM, and on information, knowledge, and communication

Friday, June 05, 2009

Next Brussels Briefing on the role of livestock for ACP countries

The next Brussels Development Briefing will be held on 1st July 2009 (8.30 – 13.00) and will deal with 'The Role of Livestock for ACP countries: challenges and opportunities ahead.

This Briefing will discuss key issues on livestock for ACP countries and will review the role of livestock for ACP economies and the drivers of change.

Panel 1 will discuss the key role livestock plays in most of ACP countries in terms of livelihoods, economic development, human nutrition and rural poverty alleviation. It will also identify emerging challenges such as the recent trends on livestock food demand, the accelerated (re)emergence of diseases affecting animals and humans, the climate change impact and the challenges to meet market quality requirements.

Panel 2 will deal with future policy challenges and opportunities for the ACP livestock sector and public and donor’s support to stimulate regional trade in animal products. How can the livestock sector become an effective driving force in strengthening the regional market in animal products? What are the conditions under which ACP exporters can access EU and international markets? How to strengthen the complementarities between commercial and small-scale production?

For the programme and registration form, please check http://brusselsbriefings.net/.

Earlier Brussels Briefings looked at ' Meeting Food Safety Standards: Implications for ACP agricultural exports', 'Fighting against Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fishing (IUU): Impacts and challenges for ACP countries', 'Land access and rural development: New challenges, new opportunities', 'How does international migration affect ACP rural development?', 'Rising food prices: an opportunity for change?', 'New drivers, new players in ACP rural development', 'Does Fair Trade contribute to sustainable development?', 'The climate challenge for ACP agriculture', 'Aid for Trade', 'Advancing African Agriculture' and 'Challenges to rural development in ACP countries.'

Sign up for the Brussels Briefing newsfeed; see also the Euforic newsfeed on agriculture

Friday, January 23, 2009

CONCORD at the Joint EU-ACP Parliament Assembly in Papua New Guinea

Source: Concord Flash, nr. 56, November/December 2008

For the fourth time, CONCORD was present at the joint EU-Africa, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) Parliament Assembly (JPA) to speak out on its views. This time, the JPA took place in Papua New Guinea. Around 400 delegates were present, including around 40 out of the 78 MEPs, ACP delegates from some 40 countries and many ambassadors and members of government.

On the agenda: aid effectiveness, global crisis, Millennium Development Goals, IT in education in ACP countries, child labour, global crisis, climate change, protection of civilians, Country and Regional Strategy Papers for the 10th European Development Fund, Economic Partnership Agreements, the situation in Mauritania, Congo and Zimbabwe and workshops covering regional
issues.

Dr. Hildegard Hagemann, German Commission for Justice and Peace/VENRO, represented the CONCORD Cotonou Working Group at the JPA and other CONCORD members were present too. Almost a ritual now, the CONCORD Cotonou Working Group had once again prepared briefing notes expressing its concerns on key topics:

Gender equality and women's rights - 11-2008
Governance and Development - 11-2008
Financial perspectives and the new EC external action instruments - 11-2008
Intra-ACP funds - 11-2008
Joint EU-Africa strategy - 11-2008
Civil Society and Parliaments: collaboration to improve the impact and effectiveness of EC Aid through the Cotonou Agreement - 11-2008

Hundreds of the briefing notes were distributed and civil society organisations from the South and North were part of all events and worked jointly to influence the parliamentarians.

For further information: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/intcoop/acp or (H.Hagemann@DBK.de)

See also Euforic's newsfeeds on EU cooperation, and on Concord

Tuesday, December 16, 2008

Seminar on the future of the Cotonou Agreement

The seminar "The future of the Cotonou Agreement" gathered on December 4th in Paris around 50 participants from civil society organisations and national platforms of Development NGOs from a wide range of ACP and European countries. Participants discussed the perspectives and the challenges ahead of the ACP-EU partnership in the context of the rapid changing nature and context of the ACP-EU relationship. A final declaration was agreed upon and was presented to the French Presidency and the EU and ACP institutions.

Final Declaration

A. Having discussed the perspectives and the challenges ahead of the ACP-EU partnership in the context of the rapid changing nature and context of the ACP-EU relationship;

B. Recalling that the review of the Cotonou Partnership Agreement will take place in 2010; that the mid-term review of the Country Strategy Papers of the 10th EDF will start in 2009; that the Cotonou Partnership Agreement has a 20 year duration and will therefore come to an end in 2020;

C. Recalling the spirit and the fundamental principles of partnership, participation, and ownership entrenched in the Cotonou Partnership Agreement;

D. Considering the transformations affecting European official development aid following the adoption of the Paris Declaration, with commitments to pursue new practices and policies, particularly the increased use of budget support and the implementation of the Governance Initiative;

E. Considering that regional integration is a long-term process, which requires adequate means respecting partner countries ways of living, values and specificities, and avoiding the undifferentiated replication of existing Northern models;

F. Recalling the Kigali Declaration for development-friendly Economic Partnership Agreements, adopted by the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly on the 22nd of November 2007; recalling concerns voiced by the African, Caribbean, Pacific and European Civil Society Organisations on the continuation and outcome of the EPA negotiations;

G. Recognizing the evolving nature of the relationship between the European Union, Africa, the Pacific and the Caribbean with the adoption of regional strategies: the Joint EU-Africa strategy, the Pacific strategy and the Caribbean strategy;

H. Affirming that the issue of the future shape of the relationships between the two groups of signatories of the Cotonou Partnership Agreement should be analyzed and approached in a proactive way; that the second review of the Cotonou Partnership Agreement will be the occasion to measure the importance attached by each partner to the agreement as such but also to its spirit and fundamental principles;

We, representatives of platforms and networks of ACP and European civil society, having met in Paris on 4th December 2008 in the context of a seminar organised by the CONCORD Cotonou Working Group, urge:

Regarding regional integration

1. ACP countries to define their own integration mechanisms primarily based on the interest of their people, and valorising local resources and indigenous processes;

2. European institutions to guarantee access to funding, resources and means that are necessary to carry out a regional integration process based on a clear agenda, while avoiding encouraging competition between the various stakeholders involved in particular on governance issues;

3. European institutions to abstain from creating situations of competition between States, to make sure that their integration process promote peace, unity and cohesion;

4. Governments and civil society to facilitate and encourage an integration process coming from and for the people at national, sub regional, continental and international level, while condemning discriminatory or xenophobic policies, including the concept of « chosen migration »;

Regarding governance in ACP-EU relations


5. The European institutions to launch a transparent, inclusive and participatory review of the Governance Initiative with a view to ensure that governance profiles are elaborated through democratic processes and excluding criteria based on European short-term interests;

6. The European and ACP institutions to carry out an ambitious midterm review of the Country Strategy Papers including the evaluation of the Governance Initiative; the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly, ACP national parliaments and the European Parliament to play an central role in the follow up and monitoring process of the Governance Initiative;

7. The European institutions to refrain from promoting their short-term interests in the framework of the political dialogue with ACP countries;

8. The European institutions and ACP decision-makers to create an independent mediation mechanism in charge of overseeing the implementation of the Cotonou Partnership Agreement;

9. Members of ACP National Parliaments to get involved in the ACP-EU dialogue around governance and ACP governments to create the conditions for parliamentary participation;

10. ACP and EU Civil Society Organisations to work together in a coordinated way to develop their own democratic governance approach as a counterproposal to the governance criteria developed by the EU;

Regarding the use of budget support in the 10th EDF

11. The European institutions to consider other alternatives to budget support in order to maintain a variety of aid modalities that take into account the diversity of contexts among the ACP countries;

12. The ACP group to ensure that budget support is genuinely used with a view to achieve the Millennium Development Goals; that the priorities identified are clearly owned and oriented on people’s needs;

13. The European institutions and the ACP countries to enforce the principles of the Paris Declaration on Aid effectiveness, by creating the necessary conditions to democratic ownership and mutual accountability;

14. The European institutions and the ACP countries to facilitate full transparency at every step of the process, from the political dialogue between the EU and recipient States to the evaluation of the impact at the level of beneficiary populations;

15. The ACP group and Civil Society Organisations to reinforce democratic control mechanisms, by parliamentarians and elected local representatives, in particular on the implementation of budget support;

16. The ACP group and Civil Society Organisations to recognize that capacity-building and awareness raising of Civil Society Organisations is critical in order to ensure that they can play their watchdog role vis-à-vis both donors and recipient governments;

Regarding the future of the ACP group

17. The European institutions to be more transparent and coherent with regard to the multiple dialogue processes and relationships that they establish with regional bodies within the ACP group;

18. The ACP group to reaffirm itself as a political group of countries sharing a common vision on key international issues beyond the restrictive framework of the Cotonou Partnership Agreement and their relationship with the EU;

19. The ACP States to promote dialogue and cooperation between their regional institutions with a view to join forces within international foras and negotiations;

20. Representatives of Civil Society Organisations from the three regions to establish a regular dialogue supported by inclusive communication and exchange of information mechanisms in order to develop ACP Civil Society common positions and to engage in an in-depth dialogue with their governments. This dialogue process could be launched with the organisation of an independent Forum of ACP Civil Society Organisations, with the support of the CONCORD Cotonou Working Group, in the perspective of the midterm review of the Cotonou Partnership Agreement.

Regional and national platforms of ACP Civil Society Organisations and CONCORD and its members commit themselves to communicate this declaration to their representatives in the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly, to the ACP-EU Joint Council, and to the ACP and EU Member States and institutions.

download declaration

Check out Euforic's newsfeed on Concord

Monday, July 14, 2008

Vacancies at the European Centre for Development Policy Management

ecdpm
ECDPM helps to reduce the ‘asymmetries’ in policy making between Africa, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) and the European Union. We do this by reinforcing the capacities of public, private and non-profit organisations in ACP countries to better manage their own development policies and international cooperation. We also work with governments and organisations in Europe to make their development policies and instruments more effective.

We have pleasure in announcing the following vacancies:

Senior Adviser on Institutional & Capacity Development
To develop certain cross-cutting areas of expertise, ECDPM is looking for a creative, inspiring senior individual for a long term position to work with programme staff in strengthening the quality and impact of its dialogue, networking and capacity development activities in the context of ACP-EU cooperation.

Your long-term proven experience in Institutional and Capacity Development and your abilities to facilitate internal learning and capacity building processes will allow you to plan, manage and integrate state-of-the-art knowledge and lessons learned into the Centre’s programmes.
Closing date: 1st September 2008

Research Assistant for the Economic and Trade Cooperation Programme
ECDPM is looking for a creative individual for a 6 to 12 month assignment to execute activities that will maximize the impact of the Center’s dialogue, networking and capacity development activities in the context of ACP-EU cooperation.

Your expertise will allow you to assist in the research and execution of activities of the centre’s ACP-EU Economic & Trade Cooperation Programme as well as to assist the manager of the website www.acp-eu-trade.org.

Language requirements: Native-French level and fluent in English
Closing date: 28th July 2008

Office Assistant to our Brussels Branch
ECDPM is looking for a proactive individual who is able to work independently and accurately 80% part-time for a long term position to support our pied-à-terre in Brussels.

Your relevant Professional Education or equivalent and preferably a few years of experience in a hectic, multi cultural environment as well as your proficiency in French and English will allow you to support our academic staff in the best possible way.
Closing date: 27th July 2008

For further details and application forms, please visit www.ecdpm.org/vacancies or contact Ms. Karen Gielen, Human Resources Assistant, via kg@ecdpm.org.

Friday, April 25, 2008

Global Perspectives focus on gender

The April issue of the magazine 'Global Perspectives' focuses on Gender Equality: Pretentions and realities.

In the cover story, Helke Nasdala demonstrates that the UN money spent on gender equality, i.e. for UNIFEM, is still dramatically low compared to other UN programs and to the costs caused by gender inequality each year.

David Cronin (IPS Brussels) criticizes the EU for neglecting gender issues within the EU-ACP trade negotiations. Furthermore he demands a stronger engagement in the area of reproductive health in developing countries.

On the EPA trade talks, Glenys Kinnock (MEP) blames the European Commission for missing the development dimension within the EU-ACP trade negotiations:

"European Commission (EC) negotiators approached the talks on EPAs as if they were conventional free-trade area negotiations focused on market opening, rather than tools for development"

She calls foradjustments within the existing EPAs and a stronger consideration of development aspects in the future.

An analysis of the situation in Chad asserts that, contrary to the common media coverage, the security situation has not improved since February 2008 when rebel groups tried a coup d'état against President Déby. The author doubts if the EU peacekeeping force EUFOR has the capacity and the impartiality to handle the situation. The article calls for a stronger participation of all EU member states, disarmament, and a focus on dialogue with all actors.

The issue also has an interview with Eckhard Deutscher, the new Chairman of OECD-DAC, on the role of China in Africa, and the international aid effectiveness and finance for development agendas. Ramesh Jaura also has an article based on an interview with Ethiopia's President Girma about the past and future of his country.

Global Perspectives is a bi-lingual (English/German) publication by IPS Europe. It releases monthly editions on various themes of international cooperation and development and is available for free download.

See also Euforic newsfeeds on Aid Effectiveness, EU-ACP relations and from IPS Europe.

by Martin Behrens

Friday, April 18, 2008

Vacancies at the ACP Secretariat, Brussels

acp secretariat
The Secretariat of the African Caribbean and Pacific Group of States (ACP) announces the following vacancies at the Secretariat in Brussels:

  • 1 Expert in charge of Global Economics, Financial matters and Macro-Economic and Budget support
  • 1 Intra-ACP Projects Portfolio Management and Quality Support Officer
  • 1 Migration, Labour and Employment Officer
  • 1 Education, Science & Technology and Information Society Officer
  • 1 Environment and Climate Change Programme Officer
  • 1 Staff Development Officer

Applications for these posts must reach the Secretariat no later than 12 May 2008 and must be accompanied by a complete curriculum vitae, certified copies of diplomas, certificates and any other document testifying to the competence and professional experience of the candidates. Candidates must be nationals of Member States of the ACP Group.

All applications must be addressed to the Secretary-General by one of the following means:

  1. By post to ACP Secretariat, Avenue Georges Henri 451, 1200 Brussels, Belgium;
  2. By fax to + 32 2 735 55 73
  3. By email to info@acp.int

For full texts of the vacancies and more, please check the website

See also the Euforic newsfeeds on the ACP Secretariat and on EU-ACP cooperation

Thursday, April 10, 2008

Vacancies at ECDPM, Maastricht

ecdpm
The European Centre for Development Policy Management (ECDPM) wishes to strengthen the quality and impact of the Centre’s dialogue, networking and capacity development activities in the context of ACP-EU development cooperation by recruiting

  • 1 Programme Officer in ACP-EU Economic & Trade Cooperation
  • 2 Programme Officers in Development Policy & International Relations

To develop certain cross-cutting areas of expertise, the ECDPM is developing ‘knowledge hubs’. We are looking for two inspiring senior individuals to work with programme staff

  • 1 Senior Adviser on Development Finance & Aid Delivery
  • 1 Senior Adviser on Institutional & Capacity Development

For full texts of the vacancies and more, please go to www.ecdpm.org/vacancies

See also the Euforic newsfeeds on ECDPM and on EU-ACP cooperation

Tuesday, November 27, 2007

Economic Partnership Agreements: new dangers

Source: CIDSE Advocacy Newsletter, issue 37 (November 2007)

After long negotiations, the EU is again turning the screw on African Caribbean and Pacific Countries (ACP) in a last-ditch attempt to seal a trade liberalization deal. Under a proposal by Trade Commissioner Peter Mandelson, the EU has endorsed a watering down of its demands in the context of Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs). While this might appear as a conciliatory move towards ACP countries, it is in fact quite the opposite and creates a new danger that poor countries in Central Africa and the Caribbean, among others, will further undermine their food sovereignty.

Initially, the Commission’s Economic Partnership Agreements aimed to secure liberalization in goods as well as services and government procurement markets in ACP countries. The Commission has argued that existing agreements with ACP countries were contrary to World Trade Organization rules and that EPAs would bring these countries in conformity with international rules, as well as promote their economic integration in world markets.

Almost immediately, the proposed agreements were opposed by a majority of ACP countries as well as the NGO community. One of the first reasons for this opposition is the weakness of the EU’s proposals. While it makes very high demands (liberalization of goods, services and government procurement) on poor countries, it offers comparatively very little (quota free access to the EU market for most ACP goods – which they enjoy already and to little advantage).

The proposals take no account of ACP’s countries capacity constraints to export towards the EU or meet its stringent sanitary criteria. But most importantly, the EU has failed to explain what “integration” to the world markets would effectively mean and what tangible benefits these countries would derive from it. While the Commission has consistently stressed that these Agreements would promote “growth”, it has failed to explain how this growth would be distributed in ACP economies and whether it would contribute to reduce poverty.

Under the new proposals, the EU would now drop its claims to liberalizing services and government procurement markets in ACP countries, so that EPAs would only cover goods. It also hinted that, in some cases, liberalization could take place over a period of 25 years. Though this seems like a more sensible approach, it still represents a one-sided deal for most ACP countries: the EU merely offers a market access which ACP countries already have and are mostly unable to benefit from. Also, the deal would comprise agricultural goods without discrimination. Such goods still represent the single most important source of revenue in the ACP region. Under a liberalization agreement, ACP countries’ already weak agricultural base would be vulnerable to cheap imports from the EU. This could in turn dramatically undermine the food sovereignty and long-term economic development of ACP countries.

The most worrying development in the EU’s negotiating stance is that it is presenting this proposal as time-bound: countries that wish to have a deal must sign it by the end of this year. This means ACP countries will have less than 6 weeks to examine the proposal and effectively threatens to split the ACP community between the “haves” and the “haves not”. This approach is not only bullish, but deeply irresponsible. It also sheds further light on the “development” character of EPAs.

It now seems rather clear that the EU is not prepared to genuinely engage in a reframing of the Agreements that would put development first and trigger targeted growth in the economic sectors that need it most.

EPAs will be on the agenda of the next meeting of the CIDSE-Caritas WG on Trade and Food Security which will take place in Brussels on 6-7 December.

Read more...

See also Euforic's dossiers on trade and EU-ACP cooperation

Friday, October 26, 2007

Voices from the field: how climate changes agriculture in rural ACP countries

In the context of the European Development Days 2007, DG Development of the European Commission, CTA, UNITAR, Euforic, and IIED will organise a parallel event on the challenges of climate change for development with particular reference to the ACP countries. Session 1 will examine: “The challenges of climate change for agricultural policy and some adaptation strategies” highlighting adaptation strategies in Nigeria, Mali and Malawi. Session 2 will focus on “Increasing knowledge and sharing best practices” introducing approaches and tools to enhance information flows and access to the knowledge base.

Objectives of the workshop are to:
- Raise awareness on the potential impacts of climate change on the agricultural sector and rural communities;
- Exchange information and expertise sharing among policy-makers, researchers and practitioners;
- Provide updated information and a platform of discussion on the various experiences on the field through Information and Communication Technologies.

Target audiences are ACP-EU policy makers, civil society groups, researchers and development practitioners. An emphasis will be made on giving the voice to the experts in the field.

Input and comments will be included in the Briefings blog: http://brusselsbriefings.net/.

Wednesday 7th November 2007, 14h00 – 18h00
Faire Internacional de Lisboa
Rua do Bojador, Parque das Nações -Lisbon
Room 4 (French and English interpretation provided)

Thursday, July 05, 2007

CTA, Euforic, launch Brussels Development Briefings

The ACP-EU technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA), the European Commission, the EU Presidency, the ACP Group, Euforic, Concord, and other partners plan to organise regular development briefing sessions in Brussels on key issues and challenges for rural development in the context of EU/ACP cooperation.

A growing number of challenges have an impact on the agricultural and rural sector of the ACP countries, including climate change, migration, low interest and funding of the agriculture sector and low priority to rural development, impact of globalization on small-scale producers, opportunities and challenges posed by biofuels...

These are other issues are being tackled by a range of development organizations (international, governmental, NGOs, networks) at national and regional levels in ACP and developing countries and in Europe. However, we believe that a more structured exchange of information and experience amongst the development community in Brussels would greatly strengthen these dispersed efforts, by enhancing communication, promoting coherence, and increasing collaboration and partnerships.

The target group of such briefings is the wider 'development' community in Brussels (EC services, European Parliament, NGOs and networks, ACP group, EU Member States representatives...)

The first briefing was held in Brussels on 4 July 2007. It focussed on key challenges to rural development: (1) the macro-economic environment and its impact on the rural poor in ACP countries; (2) the policy context, especially African regional integration processes, and (3) aid effectiveness and the harmonization of donor support directed towards rural issues in ACP countries.

Wednesday, May 09, 2007

EPA development benchmarks and monitoring

A workshop on EPA Development Benchmarks and Monitoring took place on 23-24 April in Nairobi and was organised by CUTS, ECDPM and FES in cooperation with APRODEV. The multi-sectoral workshop envisioned a cross-sectoral fertilization of ideas to enable Kenya and the ESA region to propose indicators used in monitoring the EPA process. A development benchmarks approach to assess the conduct and outcome of EPAs could provide an important tool for the development-focused monitoring of the EPA
implementation and thus link the two processes. Moreover, ECDPM and DIE (German Development Institute) have launched a joint activity that aims to elaborate options for monitoring the implementation and impacts of EPAs (see www.ecdpm.org/trade/epamonitoring).

An important contribution was provided by the advisor to the Ethiopian government Mr Ahmed Hashim outlining preliminary set of benchmarks and provisions for the ESA EPA text. This was complemented with a contribution by Mr Werner Corrales-Leal from ICTSD describing the conceptual and strategical implications in linking development goals, policy actions and trade disciplines. Development benchmarks would need to be defined according to identified supply side impediments and the set of actions or measures needed to attain increased production, value addition and diversification for specific crops or sectors. Development benchmarks would be a tool to describe development strategies that aim at building supply capacity by means of flexibilities (policy space), active policies (social, economic, political and environmental)and development finance (additional resources). This way, benchmarks are process outcomes that allow measuring the level of achievement of set development objectives by use of specific instruments (policies, rules, resources) as defined in trade supported development strategies. Principles for such a monitoring mechanism would be mutual accountability on commitments taken by EU and ACP countries and ownership of development strategies. Necessarily, a monitoring mechanism of process outcomes (benchmarks) set to achieve specific development goals should allow and lead to possible revisiting of (EPA) trade provisions. The results of the workshops are twofold: On the one side, there was support that any EPA text would need to recognise the principle of trade liberalisation that is supported by development strategies and flexibilities to achieve sustainable development goals, and that any EPA text would need to introduce the concept and need for monitoring and benchmarking along with clear recommendations for further implementation and elaboration of indicators. On the other side, the workshop revealed the challenges ahead to clarify the understanding and to build capacity of NSA to engage in defining trade related development strategies that are supported by a benchmarking approach.

Source: EU News - Issue 3, May 2007 (APRODEV, CIDSE, Caritas Europa).

See also Euforic dossier on ACP trade.

Monday, March 26, 2007

Allow more time for negotiating fair Economic Partnership Agreements

The negotiations between the European Union (EU) and the ACP countries on the Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) are at a critical stage. European and ACP civil society organisations are deeply concerned about the impact of the proposed agreements on the economies, environment, regional integration initiatives
and livelihoods of the people in ACP countries.

European NGOs seized the opportunity presented by the EU-ACP Joint Ministerial Trade Committee (1 March) and the Informal Development Ministers Meeting (12 and 13 March) to stress their major concerns regarding the ongoing negotiations. In a letter, European NGOs call for the negotiations to be delayed in order to ensure that EPAs are good development tools.

It is imperative to take the time pressure off the negotiations in order to ensure that the results of the review process are thoroughly analysed. Singapore issues (investment, competition, transparency, government procurement and trade facilitation) should be omitted, as the ACP countries have repeatedly stated that they refuse to negotiate deals on these issues with the European Union. The EU should offer the ACP countries some alternatives to the EPAs, as envisaged in the Cotonou Agreement, and should uphold the principle of non-reciprocity and the right for developing countries to protect their economies. In addition, the EU should promote self-determination in the regional integration processes of ACP countries and ensure transparency and participation by civil society.

For more information: Marc Maes (marc.maes@11.be), Ester Asín Martínez (ester.asin@concordeurope.org)

Source: CONCORD Flash - February 2007.

See also Euforic dossier on ACP trade.

Wednesday, February 14, 2007

NGOs denounce EU pressure over new African Trade deals

An informal coalition of Non-Governmental Organisations including 11-11-11, ActionAid International, Oxfam International, and Enda today called on the European Commission to stop pressuring Africa to agree new trade relationships by the end of the year, warning that the current proposals would have very damaging implications for development.

The NGO warning follows a meeting of UN experts, African trade ministers, and civil society representatives in Nairobi on Monday and Tuesday, in which a review of EPAs was discussed.

The review, carried out by the UN Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA) and endorsed by the African Union Trade Ministers, concludes that none of the four African regions have sufficient information or are adequately prepared to finalise deals in time for the official deadline of 31 December 2007. It also raises strong concerns about the capacity of developing countries to implement EPAs and highlights an 'alarming lack of transparency' in the negotiations.

Despite the clearly articulated concerns of African negotiators and observers on content and process, and a stated commitment that no country would be compelled to sign an EPA, the European Commission has been playing hardball over recent weeks, refusing to grant extra time, and issuing warnings about the negative results of not signing.

For example, West African and Central African negotiators were told last week by EU Commissioners, Peter Mandelson and Louis Michel that higher import duties would be re-imposed if EPAs were not concluded by 31 December 2007. In addition, promises of aid are being made conditional on the agreement of an EPA.

"This is tantamount to blackmail", said Bibiane Mbaye of Enda. "The EU has committed to ensuring that alternatives to EPAs are discussed, and that no country will be compelled to sign. However, now they are using the looming deadline to force countries into agreements that could be economically devastating".

"The implication is that there are no other alternatives, but this is not the case," said Luis Morago of Oxfam International. "What is lacking is political will from the EU. Instead of actively seeking ways to extend the deadline and ensure development-friendly deals, they are turning the screws on the African countries, and pushing them into agreements that will hurt poor farmers and undermine future industrial development."

"The EC is trying to sidestep a 'real' development deal by bullying ACP countries with threats of higher import duties", said Mariano Iossa of ActionAid "However, the Cotonou agreement clearly states that no ACP country should be worse off as a result of the negotiations".

The coalition believes:

  • Member States should pay more attention to the un-transparent way in which EPAs are being negotiated and the potentially negative impacts for development

  • Member States should ensure that the Commission extends trade preferences at the end of 2007 if EPA negotiations have not been concluded

  • Member States should ensure countries have sufficient information on the impact of an EPA to make an informed and pro-development decision and that alternatives to EPAs are fully explored

Signed by: 11-11-11, ActionAid International, Bread for the World, Church Development Service (EED), Danish Association for International Cooperation, Enda, Finnish NGDO platform to the EU, FinnChurchAid Finland, Friends of the Earth Finland, IBIS – Education for Development, Interchurch Organization for Development Cooperation (ICCO), KOSA (Coordination Southern Africa), Oxfam International, SOMO (Centre for Research on Multinational Corporations), Tearfund, Traidcraft, World Economy, Ecology & Development (WEED), World Rural Forum

For more information, please contact one of the following spokespeople:

Source: ActionAid International press release

See also europafrica.org and Euforic dossiers on ACP trade, ACP-EU cooperation, Africa.